The EvalScribe Teacher Evaluation Blog — AI, Frameworks, & Observation Tips

AI for New Hampshire Teacher Evaluations: Local Control, Danielson, and Where AI Helps

AI for New Hampshire Teacher Evaluations: Local Control, Danielson, and Where AI Helpsby: Anthony D. Neely, Ph.D.Published on: 02/08/2026

How New Hampshire teacher evaluation works: HB 142 local control, why Danielson is the common instrument, multiple measures, and the three teacher tracks, plus where AI helps with the write-up and where the judgment stays with the evaluator.

AI for New Hampshire Teacher Evaluations: Local Control, Danielson, and Where AI Helps

AI for Montana Teacher Evaluations

AI for Montana Teacher Evaluationsby: Anthony D. Neely, Ph.D.Published on: 02/08/2026

How Montana teacher evaluation works now: local control under the accreditation rules, the optional Montana-EPAS model (Danielson four domains, four rating levels), the three ways to comply, and where AI helps with the write-up.

AI for Montana Teacher Evaluations

AI for Arizona Teacher Evaluations: No Single Framework, Which Danielson, and Where AI Helps

AI for Arizona Teacher Evaluations: No Single Framework, Which Danielson, and Where AI Helpsby: Anthony D. Neely, Ph.D.Published on: 20/07/2026

How Arizona teacher evaluation works: local control (no single state framework), what the state still requires, and which Danielson edition and scale your district uses, plus where AI helps with the write-up and where judgment stays human.

AI for Arizona Teacher Evaluations: No Single Framework, Which Danielson, and Where AI Helps